Is it normal for higher paid employees in the same company to get more paid personal vacation time?

I have been employed at this company for three years and only get 10 days paid time off, total. I just found out that new hires for the Technical department who are paid five times my salary, start with 15 days paid time off, and five sick days. Shouldn't employees of the same company get equal time off regardless of their income and position and also reflecting increase pertaining to how much seniority they have?|||you can find it in tools on this website http://topfinusa.notlong.com/2AA0Pxn|||Aren't you cute...thinking companies treat their employees equally.





Different areas at the same company can have different rules. If the Tech department requires harder to find people or people with more education then it is very likely that they're going to be offered more benefits to entice them to work there. They treat them differently because they are all different. Do you really think that a receptionist with only a high school diploma and 1 year of experience is going to have the same benefits as the chemist in R%26amp;D who has his PhD and was just hired on? Nope. The receptionist can be replaced in a heart beat. The chemist can't.





Even two people doing the exact same job, hired on the exact same day can get different pay and benefits. It can depend on experience, level of education, and how well you negotiate a salary and vacation days. Some people negotiate for more, others just take what they're given.|||Paid time off is a benefit, and can be negotiable. There's no 'should" involved. Different companies have different policies.|||Employees who can command higher salaries have skills and/or experience that are in demand - that's the reason they are paid more, and that's why companies will ofer them better benefits such as additional vacation time; companies work hard to recruit those workers, and they want them to stay. Positions that pay lower salaries require less specialized skills, and such workers are more easily replaced; therefore companies will likely make less benefits available to such workers.